i3-6100 vs Xeon E3-1240

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
3.41
+26.3%
Core i3-6100
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.70

Xeon E3-1240 outperforms Core i3-6100 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15531702
Place by popularitynot in top-10089
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.040.63
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiency4.024.99
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$209$117

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1240 has 224% better value for money than i3-6100.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size216 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature69 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA1155FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI-no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 3.41
+26.3%
i3-6100 2.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 5403
+26.5%
i3-6100 4270

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 554
i3-6100 1212
+119%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 1943
i3-6100 2369
+21.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.41 2.70
Recency 3 April 2011 1 September 2015
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 51 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 has a 26.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-6100, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 56.9% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1240 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-6100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 and Core i3-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240
Xeon E3-1240
Intel Core i3-6100
Core i3-6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 170 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1502 votes

Rate Core i3-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 or Core i3-6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.