EPYC 7402P vs Xeon E3-1240 v5

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1240 v5
2015
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
5.29
EPYC 7402P
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
28.27
+434%

EPYC 7402P outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v5 by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1187171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.7813.53
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon E3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency6.1414.59
Architecture codenameSkylake-DT (2015)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date19 October 2015 (9 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$282$1,250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7402P has 258% better value for money than Xeon E3-1240 v5.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3528
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size122 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors1,750 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1151,FCLGA2011TR4
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
SGXYes with both Intel® SPS and Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4N/Ano data
Max resolution over eDPN/Ano data
Max resolution over DisplayPortN/Ano data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXN/Ano data
OpenGLN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 5.29
EPYC 7402P 28.27
+434%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 8253
EPYC 7402P 44070
+434%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 1318
+10.8%
EPYC 7402P 1190

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon E3-1240 v5 4329
EPYC 7402P 9541
+120%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.29 28.27
Recency 19 October 2015 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon E3-1240 v5 has 125% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7402P, on the other hand, has a 434.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7402P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1240 v5 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1240 v5 and EPYC 7402P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
Xeon E3-1240 v5
AMD EPYC 7402P
EPYC 7402P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 161 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1240 v5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 7402P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1240 v5 or EPYC 7402P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.