EPYC Embedded 8434P vs Xeon E3-1235

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1617not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.42no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.18no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Siena (2023−2024)
Release date3 April 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$287no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads896
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm
Die size216 mm24x 73 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million35,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155SP6
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P3000N/A
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes2096

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2011 1 October 2024
Physical cores 4 48
Threads 8 96
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon E3-1235 has 110.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC Embedded 8434P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1235 and EPYC Embedded 8434P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1235
Xeon E3-1235
AMD EPYC Embedded 8434P
EPYC Embedded 8434P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 25 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 8434P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1235 or EPYC Embedded 8434P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.