EPYC 9655P vs Xeon E3-1230 v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v3
2013
4 cores / 8 threads, 80 Watt
4.29
EPYC 9655P
2024
96 cores / 192 threads, 400 Watt
100.00
+2231%

EPYC 9655P outperforms Xeon E3-1230 v3 by a whopping 2231% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking13721
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.132.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesXeon (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency5.0723.66
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Turin (2024)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$240$10,811

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has 19% better value for money than EPYC 9655P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm4 nm
Die size160 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 4.29
EPYC 9655P 100.00
+2231%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v3 6818
EPYC 9655P 158845
+2230%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.29 100.00
Recency 2 June 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 400 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 v3 has 400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9655P, on the other hand, has a 2231% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9655P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1230 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v3 and EPYC 9655P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
Xeon E3-1230 v3
AMD EPYC 9655P
EPYC 9655P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 561 vote

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 251 vote

Rate EPYC 9655P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v3 or EPYC 9655P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.