Athlon II X4 630 vs Xeon E3-1230 v2

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1230 v2
2012
4 cores / 8 threads, 69 Watt
4.05
+187%

Xeon E3-1230 v2 outperforms Athlon II X4 630 by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14322232
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.636.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.351.35
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)16 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$360$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X4 630 has 269% better value for money than Xeon E3-1230 v2.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2169 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155AM3
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32.77 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 4.05
+187%
Athlon II X4 630 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1230 v2 6198
+188%
Athlon II X4 630 2153

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.05 1.41
Recency 14 May 2012 16 September 2009
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E3-1230 v2 has a 187.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 37.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1230 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1230 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X4 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1230 v2 and Athlon II X4 630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1230 v2
Xeon E3-1230 v2
AMD Athlon II X4 630
Athlon II X4 630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2672 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1230 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 322 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1230 v2 or Athlon II X4 630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.