Atom Z3735G vs Xeon E3-1225 v2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1225 v2
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 77 Watt
3.08
+516%

Xeon E3-1225 v2 outperforms Atom Z3735G by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16112857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.96no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$200$17

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size160 mm2112 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155UTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32.77 GB1 GB
Max memory channels21
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s5.3 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD P4000Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHz646 MHz
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1225 v2 3.08
+516%
Atom Z3735G 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1225 v2 4750
+515%
Atom Z3735G 772

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.08 0.50
Recency 14 May 2012 9 April 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon E3-1225 v2 has a 516% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom Z3735G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 3750% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E3-1225 v2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z3735G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1225 v2 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z3735G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1225 v2 and Atom Z3735G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1225 v2
Xeon E3-1225 v2
Intel Atom Z3735G
Atom Z3735G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 214 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1225 v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 59 votes

Rate Atom Z3735G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1225 v2 or Atom Z3735G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.