Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) vs Xeon E3-1220L v3

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220L v3
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.89
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
3.13
+252%

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by a whopping 252% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25401612
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency5.263.12
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Thuban (2010)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed1.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4096 KB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size160 mm2346 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM3
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W).

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220L v3 0.89
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 3.13
+252%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220L v3 1407
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) 4965
+253%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.89 3.13
Recency 2 June 2013 1 May 2010
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E3-1220L v3 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 630.8% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), on the other hand, has a 251.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L v3 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E3-1220L v3 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Xeon E3-1220L v3
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)
Phenom II X6 1055T (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1623 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1055T (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220L v3 or Phenom II X6 1055T (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.