Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon E3-1220L v3

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E3-1220L v3
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.92
Opteron 3320 EE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.25
+35.9%

Opteron 3320 EE outperforms Xeon E3-1220L v3 by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25372324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency5.244.56
Architecture codenameHaswell-WS (2013−2014)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date2 June 2013 (11 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache4096 KB (shared)8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size160 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors1,400 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E3-1220L v3 0.92
Opteron 3320 EE 1.25
+35.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E3-1220L v3 1407
Opteron 3320 EE 1918
+36.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 1.25
Recency 2 June 2013 4 December 2012
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 25 Watt

Xeon E3-1220L v3 has an age advantage of 5 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

Opteron 3320 EE, on the other hand, has a 35.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores.

The Opteron 3320 EE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1220L v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E3-1220L v3 and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E3-1220L v3
Xeon E3-1220L v3
AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E3-1220L v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E3-1220L v3 or Opteron 3320 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.