N200 vs Xeon E-2478

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2478
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 80 Watt
18.78
+487%

Xeon E-2478 outperforms N200 by a whopping 487% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2478 and N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3201613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation82.67no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency22.2050.44
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)no data
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$568no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2478 and N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads164
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5.2 GHzno data
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache24 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmno data
Die size257 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2478 and N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1700no data
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2478 and N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data

Security technologies

Xeon E-2478 and N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2478 and N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2478 and N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2478 and N200.

PCIe version5no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2478 18.78
+487%
N200 3.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2478 29827
+487%
N200 5083

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.78 3.20
Recency 14 December 2023 1 January 2023
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon E-2478 has a 486.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 300% more threads.

N200, on the other hand, has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2478 is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2478 is a server/workstation processor while N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2478 and N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2478
Xeon E-2478
Intel N200
N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2478 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2478 or N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.