i9-14900F vs Xeon E-2468

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2468
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.51
Core i9-14900F
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
29.78
+80.4%

Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon E-2468 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking393142
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation93.0648.68
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency24.0443.36
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$426$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2468 has 91% better value for money than i9-14900F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size257 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology22.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version55.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2468 16.51
i9-14900F 29.78
+80.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2468 26221
i9-14900F 47298
+80.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.51 29.78
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32

i9-14900F has a 80.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i9-14900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2468 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon E-2468 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2468 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2468
Xeon E-2468
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2468 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 89 votes

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2468 or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.