EPYC 4364P vs Xeon E-2456

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon E-2456
2023
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
13.78
EPYC 4364P
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
22.61
+64.1%

EPYC 4364P outperforms Xeon E-2456 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking539234
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation84.0145.96
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency16.2920.37
Architecture codenameRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2456 has 83% better value for money than EPYC 4364P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate16 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache18 MB (shared)32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die size163 mm271 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data6,570 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P.

PCIe version55.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon E-2456 13.78
EPYC 4364P 22.61
+64.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon E-2456 21882
EPYC 4364P 35909
+64.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.78 22.61
Recency 14 December 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon E-2456 has 31.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4364P, on the other hand, has a 64.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The EPYC 4364P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2456 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon E-2456 and EPYC 4364P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon E-2456
Xeon E-2456
AMD EPYC 4364P
EPYC 4364P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E-2456 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4364P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon E-2456 or EPYC 4364P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.