EPYC 9654 vs Xeon D-2795NT

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-2795NT
2022
20 cores / 40 threads, 110 Watt
18.60
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
76.66
+312%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon D-2795NT by a whopping 312% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.30
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.4219.42
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa (2022−2023)
Release date1 January 2022 (2 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)96
Threads40192
Base clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCBGA2579SP5
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes32128
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-2795NT 18.60
EPYC 9654 76.66
+312%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-2795NT 28463
EPYC 9654 117317
+312%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.60 76.66
Recency 1 January 2022 10 November 2022
Physical cores 20 96
Threads 40 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon D-2795NT has 227.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654, on the other hand, has a 312.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, 380% more physical cores and 380% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-2795NT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2795NT and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-2795NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 992 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-2795NT or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.