Xeon D-1746TER vs D-2766NT
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Architecture codename | no data | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,069 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 28 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | 15 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA2579 | FCBGA2227 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 67 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 3 |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 32 | 16 |
| USB revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | 4 | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2022 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 10 |
| Threads | 28 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 97 Watt | 67 Watt |
Xeon D-2766NT has 40% more physical cores and 40% more threads.
Xeon D-1746TER, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, and 44.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-2766NT and Xeon D-1746TER, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
