Ultra 7 265KF vs Xeon D-1732TE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1732TE
2022
8 cores / 16 threads, 52 Watt
8.97
Core Ultra 7 265KF
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.07
+313%

Core Ultra 7 265KF outperforms Xeon D-1732TE by a whopping 313% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85889
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.5697.72
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency16.3228.07
Architecture codenameIce Lake-D (2022−2023)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date24 February 2022 (2 years ago)24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$730$379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ultra 7 265KF has 282% better value for money than Xeon D-1732TE.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)3 MB (per core)
L3 cache15 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA22271851
Power consumption (TDP)52 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size384 GBno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes1620
USB revision3.0no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports24no data
Number of USB ports4no data
Integrated LAN+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1732TE 8.97
Ultra 7 265KF 37.07
+313%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1732TE 14254
Ultra 7 265KF 58883
+313%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 37.07
Recency 24 February 2022 24 October 2024
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 52 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon D-1732TE has 140.4% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265KF, on the other hand, has a 313.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 150% more physical cores and 25% more threads, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 7 265KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1732TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon D-1732TE is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 265KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1732TE and Core Ultra 7 265KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1732TE
Xeon D-1732TE
Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF
Core Ultra 7 265KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1732TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1732TE or Core Ultra 7 265KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.