Atom x3-3205RK vs Xeon D-1702
Primary details
Comparing Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Architecture codename | no data | Silvermont (2015) |
Release date | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) | 2 March 2015 (9 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 56K (per core) |
L2 cache | no data | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 5 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA2227 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | - | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR2, DDR3 1333 MHz Single-channel |
Maximum memory size | 256 GB | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Mali-450 MP4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
USB revision | 3.0 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 24 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 4 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2022 | 2 March 2015 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 2 Watt |
Xeon D-1702 has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Atom x3-3205RK, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 1150% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon D-1702 is a server/workstation processor while Atom x3-3205RK is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1702 and Atom x3-3205RK, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.