Xeon E5-2630L v4 vs D-1567

Aggregate performance score

Xeon D-1567
2016
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
6.58
+4.4%
Xeon E5-2630L v4
2016
10 cores / 20 threads, 55 Watt
6.30

Xeon D-1567 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v4 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10361062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.622.58
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon DIntel Xeon E5
Power efficiency9.5810.84
Architecture codenameBroadwell (2015−2019)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date24 February 2016 (8 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,069$612

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5-2630L v4 has 59% better value for money than Xeon D-1567.

Detailed specifications

Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2420
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0QPI
Bus rateno data2 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2118
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache256K (per core)2.5 MB
L3 cache1.5 MB (per core)25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size306.18 mm2246.24 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data62 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)80 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,200 million3200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1667FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX2Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
GPIO+no data

Security technologies

Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, DDR3DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size128 GB1.5 TB
Max memory channels24
Maximum memory bandwidth34.124 GB/s68.3 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4.

PCIe version2.0/3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2440
USB revision2.0/3.0no data
Total number of SATA ports6no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN+no data
UART+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon D-1567 6.58
+4.4%
Xeon E5-2630L v4 6.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon D-1567 10447
+4.5%
Xeon E5-2630L v4 10000

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.58 6.30
Recency 24 February 2016 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 10
Threads 24 20
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon D-1567 has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads.

Xeon E5-2630L v4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 18.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon D-1567 and Xeon E5-2630L v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon D-1567
Xeon D-1567
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v4
Xeon E5-2630L v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1567 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 14 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2630L v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon D-1567 or Xeon E5-2630L v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.