Apple M1 vs Xeon 6517P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon 6517P
2025, $1,195
16 cores / 32 threads, 190 Watt
27.68
+495%

Xeon 6517P outperforms M1 by a whopping 495% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2131433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency15.62no data
DesignerIntelApple
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameGranite Rapids (2024−2025)no data
Release date24 February 2025 (less than a year ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,195no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon 6517P and M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads328
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache112 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)16 MB
L3 cache72 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 3 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon 6517P and M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4710no data
Power consumption (TDP)190 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 6517P and M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon 6517P and M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 6517P and M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 6517P and M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5(6400MT/s)no data
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon 6517P and M1.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes88no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon 6517P 27.68
+495%
Apple M1 4.65

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon 6517P 48810
+495%
Samples: 5
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.68 4.65
Recency 24 February 2025 10 November 2020
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 8

Xeon 6517P has a 495.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6517P is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon 6517P is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon 6517P
Xeon 6517P
Apple M1
M1

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6517P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2413 votes

Rate M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon 6517P and M1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.