Duron 600 vs Xeon 5063
Primary details
Comparing Xeon 5063 and Duron 600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Duron |
| Architecture codename | Dempsey (2006) | Spitfire (2000−2001) |
| Release date | May 2006 (18 years ago) | 15 January 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $112 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon 5063 and Duron 600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 0.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 200 MT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 6 |
| L1 cache | 0 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 67 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon 5063 and Duron 600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | PLGA771 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27.4 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon 5063 and Duron 600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon 5063 and Duron 600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon 5063 and Duron 600 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon 5063 and Duron 600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 27 Watt |
Xeon 5063 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 600, on the other hand, has 251.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon 5063 and Duron 600. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon 5063 is a server/workstation processor while Duron 600 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon 5063 and Duron 600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
