Pentium 4 HT 641 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesVIAno data
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Cedar Mill (2006)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)January 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KB28 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography40 nm65 nm
Die size132 mm281 mm2
Number of transistorsno data188 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA775
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt86 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 86 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 218.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is a notebook processor while Pentium 4 HT 641 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and Pentium 4 HT 641, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
Intel Pentium 4 HT 641
Pentium 4 HT 641

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 641 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or Pentium 4 HT 641, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.