A9-9410 vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

VS

Primary details

Comparing VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2491
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesVIAAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiencyno data6.07
Architecture codenameCNQ (2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.46 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB2048 KB
Chip lithography40 nm28 nm
Die size132 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFP4
Power consumption (TDP)27.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2133
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data3
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 1615
A9-9410 2455
+52%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 27 Watt 15 Watt

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A9-9410, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 and A9-9410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Nano QuadCore L4700
AMD A9-9410
A9-9410

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 113 votes

Rate A9-9410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 or A9-9410, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.