Xeon X3470 vs V-Series V140
Primary details
Comparing V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1893 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD V-Series | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 2.05 |
Architecture codename | Champlain (2010−2011) | no data |
Release date | 4 October 2010 (14 years ago) | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.93 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Bus rate | 3200 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
L3 cache | no data | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 73 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | S1 | FCLGA1156,LGA1156 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | Intel® SSE4.2 |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
Security technologies
V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 21 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470.
PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 4 October 2010 | 1 July 2009 |
Physical cores | 1 | 4 |
Threads | 1 | 8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 95 Watt |
V-Series V140 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 280% lower power consumption.
Xeon X3470, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that V-Series V140 is a notebook processor while Xeon X3470 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between V-Series V140 and Xeon X3470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.