A4-4355M vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53
+3.9%
A4-4355M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.51

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 outperforms A4-4355M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28522871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraAMD A-Series
Power efficiency1.432.84
Architecture codenameGriffin (2008−2009)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)27 September 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB96 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1g2FP2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.1-1.125V86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataunknown Dual-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7400G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 0.53
+3.9%
A4-4355M 0.51

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1965
+16.3%
A4-4355M 1690

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 3840
+65.7%
A4-4355M 2318

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 1618
+30.5%
A4-4355M 1239

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 34.9
+81.9%
A4-4355M 63.5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 0.51
Recency 3 June 2008 27 September 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 has a 3.9% higher aggregate performance score.

A4-4355M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 and A4-4355M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86
AMD A4-4355M
A4-4355M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 11 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate A4-4355M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 or A4-4355M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.