Celeron P4600 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.56
+5.7%
Celeron P4600
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.53

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 outperforms Celeron P4600 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28192846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion UltraIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.511.43
Architecture codenamePuma (2008−2009)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)28 March 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate4400 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data15
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache2 MB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g2PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
FMA-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.53
Recency 4 June 2008 28 March 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron P4600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 and Celeron P4600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Intel Celeron P4600
Celeron P4600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 6 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Celeron P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 or Celeron P4600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.