Ryzen 5 8645HS vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8645HS outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a whopping 2960% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2914 | 499 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.27 | 30.24 |
Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Base clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 5 GHz |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | S1g2 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | Ryzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.47 | 14.38 |
Recency | 4 June 2008 | 6 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
Threads | 2 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has 28.6% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 8645HS, on the other hand, has a 2959.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The Ryzen 5 8645HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Ryzen 5 8645HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.