Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2914 | 2802 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.27 | 0.45 |
| Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 4 June 2008 (16 years ago) | August 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.47 | 0.59 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 125 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 25.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 in performance tests.
Be aware that Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
