Pentium T4200 vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82
Aggregate performance score
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 outperforms Pentium T4200 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2934 | 2944 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | 2x AMD Turion Ultra | no data |
Power efficiency | 1.24 | 1.21 |
Architecture codename | Puma (2008−2009) | no data |
Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | no data |
Threads | 2 | no data |
Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | S1g2 | PGA478 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
PowerNow | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.46 | 0.45 |
Recency | 3 June 2008 | 1 January 2009 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score.
Pentium T4200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion X2 Ultra ZM-82 and Pentium T4200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.