Pentium M 735 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-62

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-62
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.43
+139%
Pentium M 735
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 outperforms Pentium M 735 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29793262
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64Pentium M
Power efficiency1.160.81
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date13 April 2007 (17 years ago)10 May 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions2x 512 KB Level2 Cacheno data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 0.43
+139%
Pentium M 735 0.18

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 1559
+6.9%
Pentium M 735 1459

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 1475
+111%
Pentium M 735 698

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 0.18
Recency 13 April 2007 10 May 2004
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 7 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-62 has a 138.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 735, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-62 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 735 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-62 and Pentium M 735, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-62
Turion 64 X2 TL-62
Intel Pentium M 735
Pentium M 735

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 15 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 12 votes

Rate Pentium M 735 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-62 or Pentium M 735, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.