Athlon XP 2500+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-60
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.46
+207%
Athlon XP 2500+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.15

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 outperforms Athlon XP 2500+ by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon XP 2500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29333327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion 64no data
Power efficiency1.240.21
Architecture codenameTrinidad/Tyler (2007)Barton (2001−2004)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)February 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon XP 2500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size147 mm2101 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistors154 Million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon XP 2500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1A
Power consumption (TDP)35/31 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon XP 2500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions90/65 nm, 1.075no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 68 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-60 has a 206.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 94.3% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2500+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2500+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-60 and Athlon XP 2500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-60
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
AMD Athlon XP 2500+
Athlon XP 2500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 106 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 35 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-60 or Athlon XP 2500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.