i3-9100F vs Turion 64 X2 TL-58

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-58
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 31 Watt
0.39
Core i3-9100F
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.19
+974%

Core i3-9100F outperforms Turion 64 X2 TL-58 by a whopping 974% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30671430
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.63
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD Turion 64Intel Core i3
Power efficiency1.206.14
Architecture codenameTyler (2007−2009)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release date4 May 2007 (17 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate800 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 4.19
Recency 4 May 2007 23 April 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 65 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-58 has 109.7% lower power consumption.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has a 974.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i3-9100F is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 X2 TL-58 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 X2 TL-58 is a notebook processor while Core i3-9100F is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Turion 64 X2 TL-58
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-58 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 7211 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 X2 TL-58 and Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.