Pentium Dual-Core E2200 vs Turion 64 MT-40

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-40
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.47
+124%

Pentium Dual-Core E2200 outperforms Turion 64 MT-40 by a whopping 124% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32242923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesTurion 64no data
Power efficiency0.790.68
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Allendale (2006−2009)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)December 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size125 mm277 mm2
Number of transistors114 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754775
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.47
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

Turion 64 MT-40 has 160% lower power consumption.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200, on the other hand, has a 123.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Turion 64 MT-40 is a notebook processor while Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-40 and Pentium Dual-Core E2200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-40
Turion 64 MT-40
Intel Pentium Dual-Core E2200
Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate Turion 64 MT-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 230 votes

Rate Pentium Dual-Core E2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 MT-40 or Pentium Dual-Core E2200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.