Celeron N3160 vs Turion 64 MT-37

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 MT-37
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.21
Celeron N3160
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
0.75
+257%

Celeron N3160 outperforms Turion 64 MT-37 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32142652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.7917.74
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Braswell (2015−2016)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)15 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.24 GHz
Bus typeno dataIDI
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors114 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket754FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
VT-ino data-
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 640 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data640 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 0.75
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

Celeron N3160 has a 257.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron N3160 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-37 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-37 and Celeron N3160, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 MT-37
Turion 64 MT-37
Intel Celeron N3160
Celeron N3160

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion 64 MT-37 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 195 votes

Rate Celeron N3160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 MT-37 or Celeron N3160, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.