Celeron Dual-Core T3300 vs Turion 64 MT-28
Aggregate performance score
Celeron Dual-Core T3300 outperforms Turion 64 MT-28 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3256 | 2991 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Turion 64 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
| Power efficiency | 0.68 | 1.08 |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | June 2005 (19 years ago) | 1 February 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 754 | Socket P 478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Security technologies
Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.18 | 0.40 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion 64 MT-28 has 40% lower power consumption.
Celeron Dual-Core T3300, on the other hand, has a 122.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The Celeron Dual-Core T3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MT-28 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 MT-28 and Celeron Dual-Core T3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
