A4-9120 vs Turion 64 ML-37

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-37
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.20
A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.76
+280%

A4-9120 outperforms Turion 64 ML-37 by a whopping 280% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32732698
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency0.544.82
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)1 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm28 nm
Die size125 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors114 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket754BGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataVirtualization,
PowerNow+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 0.76
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A4-9120 has a 280% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-37 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-37
Turion 64 ML-37
AMD A4-9120
A4-9120

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion 64 ML-37 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 507 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Turion 64 ML-37 and A4-9120, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.