Celeron 3205U vs Turion 64 ML-34

VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 ML-34
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18
Celeron 3205U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.60
+233%

Celeron 3205U outperforms Turion 64 ML-34 by a whopping 233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32632810
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesTurion 64Intel Celeron
Power efficiency0.493.78
Architecture codenameLancaster (2005−2006)Broadwell-U (2015)
Release date10 March 2005 (19 years ago)1 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm282 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors114 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.18 0.60
Recency 10 March 2005 1 March 2015
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Celeron 3205U has a 233.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 3205U is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 ML-34 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-34 and Celeron 3205U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 ML-34
Turion 64 ML-34
Intel Celeron 3205U
Celeron 3205U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Turion 64 ML-34 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 32 votes

Rate Celeron 3205U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 ML-34 or Celeron 3205U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.