Opteron X2 165 vs Turion 64 ML-32
Primary details
Comparing Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Turion 64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Lancaster (2005−2006) | Denmark (2005−2006) |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 2 August 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $417 |
Detailed specifications
Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.79 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 199 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 114 million | 233 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | 754 | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| PowerNow | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 110 Watt |
Turion 64 ML-32 has 214.3% lower power consumption.
Opteron X2 165, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Turion 64 ML-32 is a notebook processor while Opteron X2 165 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 ML-32 and Opteron X2 165, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
