Ryzen 7 8845HS vs Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Primary details
Comparing Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 331 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | no data | 38.15 |
Architecture codename | Storm Peak (2023) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
Release date | 19 October 2023 (1 year ago) | 6 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,899 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 32 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.3 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 64 MB (shared) | 16 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Die size | 2x 71 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 13,140 million | 25,000 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | sTR5 | FP8 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS.
PCIe version | 5.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 128 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 October 2023 | 6 December 2023 |
Physical cores | 16 | 8 |
Threads | 32 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 45 Watt |
Threadripper PRO 7955WX has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Ryzen 7 8845HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 677.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Threadripper PRO 7955WX is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8845HS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Threadripper PRO 7955WX and Ryzen 7 8845HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.