FX-8320 vs Steam Deck OLED APU

VS

Aggregate performance score

Steam Deck OLED APU
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.70
+34.7%
FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.49

Steam Deck OLED APU outperforms FX-8320 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12881548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesRenoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency29.102.59
Architecture codenameVan Gogh (Custom) (2023)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date9 November 2023 (1 year ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB8192 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography6 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataAM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320.

PCIe versionno datan/a

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.70 3.49
Recency 9 November 2023 23 October 2012
Physical cores 4 8
Chip lithography 6 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Steam Deck OLED APU has a 34.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

FX-8320, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Steam Deck OLED APU is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.

Be aware that Steam Deck OLED APU is a notebook processor while FX-8320 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Steam Deck OLED APU and FX-8320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Steam Deck OLED APU
Steam Deck OLED APU
AMD FX-8320
FX-8320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Steam Deck OLED APU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1385 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Steam Deck OLED APU or FX-8320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.