Athlon 64 LE-1620 vs Sempron 3400+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3257not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.27no data
Architecture codenamePalermo (2001−2005)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 October 2005 (19 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$30no data

Detailed specifications

Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128K
L2 cache128 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die size103 mm2230 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors63 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket939AM2
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt45 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 45 Watt

Athlon 64 LE-1620 has 37.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 3400+ and Athlon 64 LE-1620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 3400+
Sempron 3400+
AMD Athlon 64 LE-1620
Athlon 64 LE-1620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 14 votes

Rate Athlon 64 LE-1620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 3400+ or Athlon 64 LE-1620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.