Ultra 9 185H vs Sempron 2500+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 2500+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.13
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.51
+14138%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms Sempron 2500+ by a whopping 14138% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3344324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency0.2038.90
Architecture codenamePalermo (2001−2005)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80$640

Detailed specifications

Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.75 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm7 nm
Die size101 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors63 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 2500+ 0.13
Ultra 9 185H 18.51
+14138%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 2500+ 207
Ultra 9 185H 29403
+14104%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.13 18.51
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 22
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 45 Watt

Ultra 9 185H has a 14138.5% higher aggregate performance score, 1500% more physical cores and 2100% more threads, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 37.8% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 2500+ in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 2500+ is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2500+ and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 2500+
Sempron 2500+
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 14 votes

Rate Sempron 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 425 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 2500+ or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.