Celeron 667 vs Sempron 2200+
Primary details
Comparing Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3409 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.17 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Timna |
| Release date | January 2001 (24 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $30 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 129 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | 370S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 30 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel i752 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 30 Watt |
Sempron 2200+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 667, on the other hand, has 106.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 2200+ and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
