Celeron 827E vs Sempron 140

VS

Aggregate performance score

Sempron 140
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.31
+34.8%
Celeron 827E
1 core / 1 thread, 17 Watt
0.23

Sempron 140 outperforms Celeron 827E by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31093185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.651.28
Architecture codenameSargas (2009−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date22 July 2009 (15 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$40$89

Detailed specifications

Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speed2.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size117 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors234 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Sempron 140 0.31
+34.8%
Celeron 827E 0.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Sempron 140 486
+31%
Celeron 827E 371

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.23
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

Sempron 140 has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron 827E, on the other hand, has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 164.7% lower power consumption.

The Sempron 140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 827E in performance tests.

Note that Sempron 140 is a desktop processor while Celeron 827E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Sempron 140 and Celeron 827E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140
Intel Celeron 827E
Celeron 827E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 233 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Sempron 140 or Celeron 827E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.