Celeron G440 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2not rated
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.13no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency26.16no data
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999$45

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores961 (Single-Core)
Threads1921
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256 KB
L3 cache384 MB (shared)1 MB
Chip lithography5 nm32 nm
Die sizeCompute Die (CCD) Size 71 mm2, I/O Die (IOD) Size 388 mm2 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C66 °C
Number of transistors78,840 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440.

PCIe version5.02.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX 153665
+36487%
Celeron G440 420

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 October 2023 4 September 2011
Physical cores 96 1
Threads 192 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX has an age advantage of 12 years, 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron G440, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G440 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX and Celeron G440, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
Intel Celeron G440
Celeron G440

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2312 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 52 votes

Rate Celeron G440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX or Celeron G440, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.