Ryzen 7 3700U vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
62.51
+1239%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U by a whopping 1239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking151302
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.81no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency16.2928.39
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads648
Base clock speed4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data23
L1 cache64 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache128 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography5 nm12 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketsTR5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 10

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes12812

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 62.51
+1239%
Ryzen 7 3700U 4.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95664
+1238%
Ryzen 7 3700U 7150

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 62.51 4.67
Recency 19 October 2023 6 January 2019
Physical cores 32 4
Threads 64 8
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 1238.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 7 3700U, on the other hand, has 2233.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 3700U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 3700U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 7 3700U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1441 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 3700U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or Ryzen 7 3700U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.