Ryzen 5 5600G vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 350 Watt
62.51
+381%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 5600G by a whopping 381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15605
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.8129.67
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency16.2918.22
Architecture codenameStorm Peak (2023)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release date19 October 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,899$259

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 5600G has 151% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads6412
Base clock speed4 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed5.3 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplierno data39
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography5 nm7 nm
Die size4x 71 mm2AM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors26,280 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsTR5AM4
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon RX Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 62.51
+381%
Ryzen 5 5600G 12.99

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 95664
+381%
Ryzen 5 5600G 19875

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 62.51 12.99
Recency 19 October 2023 13 April 2021
Physical cores 32 6
Threads 64 12
Chip lithography 5 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX has a 381.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 5 5600G, on the other hand, has 438.5% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 5600G in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 5600G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX and Ryzen 5 5600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Ryzen 5 5600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 18 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8876 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX or Ryzen 5 5600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.