Threadripper PRO 7995WX vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 40 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | no data |
| Power efficiency | 16.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Chagall PRO (2022) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| Release date | 8 March 2022 (2 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 96 |
| Threads | 64 | 192 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Multiplier | 36 | no data |
| L1 cache | 2 MB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 384 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 4x 81 mm2 | 12x 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 16,600 million | 78,840 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | WRX8 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TiB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 128 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 32 | 96 |
| Threads | 64 | 192 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 350 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 25% lower power consumption.
Threadripper PRO 7995WX, on the other hand, has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is a server/workstation processor while Threadripper PRO 7995WX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Threadripper PRO 7995WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
