EPYC 7352 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
41.89
+64.9%
EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.41

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms EPYC 7352 by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking56199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data11.30
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency14.1615.51
Architecture codenameChagall PRO (2022)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date8 March 2022 (2 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4848
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier3823
L1 cache1536 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache12 MB12 MB
L3 cache128 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size4x 81 mm2192 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors16,600 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketWRX8TR4
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 41.89
+64.9%
EPYC 7352 25.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 66534
+64.8%
EPYC 7352 40370

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.89 25.41
Recency 8 March 2022 7 August 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 155 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX has a 64.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

EPYC 7352, on the other hand, has 80.6% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7352 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
AMD EPYC 7352
EPYC 7352

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX or EPYC 7352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.