EPYC 7662 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
53.69
+15.8%
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
46.38

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms EPYC 7662 by a moderate 16% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.99no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen ThreadripperAMD EPYC
Power efficiency17.8119.15
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date14 July 2020 (4 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,500no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads128128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2720
L1 cache4 MB4 MB
L2 cache32 MB32 MB
L3 cache256 MB256 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size74 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors38740 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketsWRX8Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TiB4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 53.69
+15.8%
EPYC 7662 46.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 83697
+15.8%
EPYC 7662 72298

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.69 46.38
Recency 14 July 2020 19 February 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 225 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has a 15.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 4 months.

EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has 24.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7662 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 825 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.