Ultra 9 285T vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking67not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency13.31no data
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release date14 July 2020 (4 years ago)January 2025

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads6424
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.4 GHz
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache2 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB3 MB (per core)
L3 cache128 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm3 nm
Die size74 mm2243 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °Cno data
Number of transistors23540 Million17,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketsWRX81851
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5 Depends on motherboard
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Maximum memory bandwidth204.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes12820

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 32 24
Threads 64 24
Chip lithography 7 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ultra 9 285T, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 285T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Core Ultra 9 285T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Intel Core Ultra 9 285T
Core Ultra 9 285T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 9 285T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX or Core Ultra 9 285T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.