Xeon Platinum 9282 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 108 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 17.77 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen Threadripper | Intel Xeon Platinum |
| Power efficiency | 11.68 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Matisse (2019−2020) | Cascade Lake-AP (2019) |
| Release date | 25 November 2019 (4 years ago) | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,399 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 56 (Hexapentaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 112 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 8 × 16 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 38 | 26 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 128 MB | 77 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Number of transistors | 19,200 million | 8,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 8 |
| Socket | TR4 | Intel BGA5903 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 400 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Eight-channel | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 2 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 12 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 102.403 GB/s | 281.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 25 November 2019 | 2 April 2019 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 56 |
| Threads | 48 | 112 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | 400 Watt |
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has an age advantage of 7 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 9282, on the other hand, has 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 9282 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Xeon Platinum 9282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
