Celeron J4025 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 280 Watt
35.21
+3646%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.94

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron J4025 by a whopping 3646% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1092512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.792.55
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen Threadripperno data
Power efficiency11.688.73
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date7 November 2019 (5 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,399$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has 598% better value for money than Celeron J4025.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads482
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate8 × 16 GT/sno data
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache1536 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB4 MB (shared)
L3 cache128 MB4 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors23540 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketTR4FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size256 GB8 GB
Max memory channels42
Maximum memory bandwidth102.403 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memory-8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequency-700 MHz
Execution Units-12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported-3
eDP-+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support-+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4-4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDP-4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort-4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-12
OpenGL-4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 35.21
+3646%
Celeron J4025 0.94

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 54888
+3642%
Celeron J4025 1467

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 1677
+405%
Celeron J4025 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 13268
+2357%
Celeron J4025 540

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.21 0.94
Physical cores 24 2
Threads 48 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 10 Watt

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X has a 3645.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has 2700% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen Threadripper 3960X and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 117 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 124 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen Threadripper 3960X or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.